Your browser does not support JavaScript! Please enable the settings.

Who's liable when a retail brand starts offering financial products?

Available On:

Who's liable when a retail brand starts offering financial products?

Podcast 10 - Everyone Selling Finance
Published:
29-09-2026
#Ecommerce Strategy
#Payments & Digital Finance
#Embedded Finance
#Payments
#Fintech
#Future of Commerce
#FinTech Insights
#Digital Commerce
#Agentic AI
#AI Commerce

Accelerate your Start-ups!

A dedicated space for early‑stage startup shaping their path forward.
Connect with Innovify

Everyone's Selling Finance Now: Who Carries the Regulatory Risk?

Who's liable when a retail brand starts offering financial products?

When a high-street retailer like Primark, or a luxury watch seller, starts offering buy now pay later or a branded card, who actually carries the regulatory risk: the brand, or the provider behind it?

In this episode of the GetFutureReady Podcast, host Maulik Sailor, Founder and CEO of Innovify, is joined by Justin Peimani, co-founder of Relays, a compliance platform working closely with the UK's FCA. It's a follow-on to an earlier episode with Peimani's co-founder, Lubomira, and this time the conversation turns to who actually carries the regulatory burden when a non-financial brand starts selling financial products.

When a Retailer Becomes a Regulated Entity

Peimani explains that a brand can become a regulated entity depending on exactly what product it offers. Buy now pay later, for example, became a regulated activity in the UK this year, meaning brands offering it take on reporting and conduct obligations. The size of the brand changes what's at stake: a multi-billion-pound retailer faces different scrutiny than a smaller, pre-Series A firm, but even a small business that ignores its regulatory posture can run into trouble later, including when it comes to raising capital, since investors will ask what exactly is regulated and whether the right licences are in place.

Who Carries the Compliance Burden

The conversation turns to what happens when a brand routes its offering through a provider such as Klarna or Zilch. Scale providers often take on some of the regulatory work themselves and pass on the benefit of their permissions and licences, but responsibility ultimately sits with the brand or retailer to manage the relationship, particularly given the risk created for less financially literate customers.

The Appointed Representative Route

For firms starting out, Peimani describes the "appointed representative" regime as a common first step: a smaller firm operates under an existing licence held by another firm, which takes on some of the compliance and regulatory work as a service. As the business grows, it typically progresses to bringing in a chief compliance officer or head of compliance to manage the relationship with the regulator directly, since a bigger customer base and market impact bring more regulatory questions.

The GDPR and AI Risk of Public LLMs

Peimani flags a growing risk alongside financial regulation: staff feeding customer data into public LLMs such as ChatGPT and Claude. GDPR already governs what a brand can do with customer data, and while a large company can't stop every employee from using a tool like Claude, it can sanction misuse and consider tighter internal controls, especially where regulated or sensitive customer information is involved.

Trust, Not Technology, Is the Real Barrier

Looking at AI-native challenger banks, Peimani argues the barrier to building one today isn't the technology, which is increasingly cheap and available, but trust: the relationships, licences, and regulatory comfort that take time to build. Businesses still need licensing and ongoing interactions with regulators as they grow, and skipping that groundwork tends to create bigger problems later, whether entering a new country or launching a new product.

How the FCA Compares Globally

Asked how the UK stacks up, Peimani rates the FCA among the top-tier regulators globally for how actively it engages with firms, through innovation projects, sandboxes, and conferences. Dubai and Abu Dhabi are singled out as increasingly active in courting financial services firms with schemes to attract capital, while Singapore's innovation programmes have influenced the FCA's own approach. London's edge, in Peimani's view, is the combination of a conducive regulatory environment, an established base of banks and lenders, and a concentration of technical and regulatory talent in one city that few other markets can match.

FAQ

Is buy now pay later regulated in the UK?

Yes. Buy now pay later became a regulated activity in the UK this year, meaning brands offering it directly take on reporting and conduct obligations.

Who is liable when a brand embeds a financial product through a provider like Klarna or Zilch?

Scale providers often take on part of the regulatory work and share the benefit of their licences, but ultimate responsibility for managing the offering sits with the brand or retailer.

What is the "appointed representative" route?

It's a regime that lets a smaller firm operate under an existing licence held by another firm, which takes on some compliance and regulatory work as a service, before the smaller firm builds its own compliance function.

Why is feeding customer data into tools like ChatGPT or Claude a regulatory risk?

It raises GDPR questions about what a brand can do with customer data, and regulated firms are increasingly restricting staff use of public LLMs with sensitive or regulated data.

What's the biggest barrier to building an AI-native bank today?

Trust, not technology. The technology to build financial products is cheap and available; the harder part is the licensing, regulatory relationships, and customer trust built over time.

How does the UK's FCA compare with regulators in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Singapore and the US?

Peimani rates the FCA among the top-tier regulators globally for its active engagement with firms, while noting Dubai and Abu Dhabi are aggressively courting fintech firms and Singapore's programmes have influenced the FCA's own innovation work; London's density of regulatory and technical talent remains a distinguishing edge.

Watch on youtube
Show transcript

Listen to Our Podcast on Your
Preferred Platform